From 039cf8f423d4975c180a60fca987de2b9c798ed6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vojtech Bubnik <bubnikv@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 10:41:53 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Fix of unnecessary splitting of solid fill surfaces. This is a regression issue introduced in PrusaSlicer 2.3.0 with the configurable anchoring. --- src/libslic3r/Fill/Fill.cpp | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/libslic3r/Fill/Fill.cpp b/src/libslic3r/Fill/Fill.cpp index 7b7a21f0a..e3c3eb2f2 100644 --- a/src/libslic3r/Fill/Fill.cpp +++ b/src/libslic3r/Fill/Fill.cpp @@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ std::vector<SurfaceFill> group_fills(const Layer &layer) params.spacing = params.flow.spacing(); // Don't limit anchor length for solid or bridging infill. params.anchor_length = 1000.f; + params.anchor_length_max = 1000.f; } else { // it's internal infill, so we can calculate a generic flow spacing // for all layers, for avoiding the ugly effect of @@ -178,8 +179,8 @@ std::vector<SurfaceFill> group_fills(const Layer &layer) params.anchor_length_max = float(region_config.infill_anchor_max); if (region_config.infill_anchor_max.percent) params.anchor_length_max = float(params.anchor_length_max * 0.01 * params.spacing); - } - params.anchor_length = std::min(params.anchor_length, params.anchor_length_max); + params.anchor_length = std::min(params.anchor_length, params.anchor_length_max); + } auto it_params = set_surface_params.find(params); if (it_params == set_surface_params.end())