Fix of slicing with modifiers after recent refactoring - sorting
infills into islands.
This commit is contained in:
parent
1912b834b1
commit
25dffb9c2f
@ -497,15 +497,18 @@ void Layer::make_perimeters()
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
SurfaceCollection new_slices;
|
||||
// Use the region with highest infill rate, as the make_perimeters() function below decides on the gap fill based on the infill existence.
|
||||
LayerRegion *layerm_config = m_regions[layer_region_ids.front()];
|
||||
{
|
||||
uint32_t region_id_config = layer_region_ids.front();
|
||||
LayerRegion* layerm_config = m_regions[region_id_config];
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Merge slices (surfaces) according to number of extra perimeters.
|
||||
for (uint32_t region_id : layer_region_ids) {
|
||||
LayerRegion &layerm = *m_regions[region_id];
|
||||
for (const Surface &surface : layerm.slices())
|
||||
surfaces_to_merge.emplace_back(&surface);
|
||||
if (layerm.region().config().fill_density > layerm_config->region().config().fill_density)
|
||||
layerm_config = &layerm;
|
||||
if (layerm.region().config().fill_density > layerm_config->region().config().fill_density) {
|
||||
region_id_config = region_id;
|
||||
layerm_config = &layerm;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
std::sort(surfaces_to_merge.begin(), surfaces_to_merge.end(), [](const Surface *l, const Surface *r){ return l->extra_perimeters < r->extra_perimeters; });
|
||||
for (size_t i = 0; i < surfaces_to_merge.size();) {
|
||||
@ -525,7 +528,7 @@ void Layer::make_perimeters()
|
||||
}
|
||||
// make perimeters
|
||||
layerm_config->make_perimeters(new_slices, perimeter_and_gapfill_ranges, fill_expolygons, fill_expolygons_ranges);
|
||||
this->sort_perimeters_into_islands(new_slices, region_id, perimeter_and_gapfill_ranges, std::move(fill_expolygons), fill_expolygons_ranges, layer_region_ids);
|
||||
this->sort_perimeters_into_islands(new_slices, region_id_config, perimeter_and_gapfill_ranges, std::move(fill_expolygons), fill_expolygons_ranges, layer_region_ids);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user