This commit is contained in:
bubnikv 2019-04-01 17:12:50 +02:00
commit 9594bf43b5

View File

@ -46,13 +46,13 @@ const std::array<unsigned, slaposCount> OBJ_STEP_LEVELS =
30, // slaposSupportPoints,
25, // slaposSupportTree,
25, // slaposBasePool,
10, // slaposSliceSupports,
10, // slaposSliceSupports,
};
const std::array<std::string, slaposCount> OBJ_STEP_LABELS =
{
L("Slicing model"), // slaposObjectSlice,
L("Generating support points"), // slaposSupportPoints,
L("Generating support points"), // slaposSupportPoints,
L("Generating support tree"), // slaposSupportTree,
L("Generating pad"), // slaposBasePool,
L("Slicing supports"), // slaposSliceSupports,
@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ const std::array<std::string, slaposCount> OBJ_STEP_LABELS =
// Should also add up to 100 (%)
const std::array<unsigned, slapsCount> PRINT_STEP_LEVELS =
{
5, // slapsStats
5, // slapsMergeSlicesAndEval
95, // slapsRasterize
};
@ -645,7 +645,7 @@ void SLAPrint::process()
const size_t objcount = m_objects.size();
const unsigned min_objstatus = 0; // where the per object operations start
const unsigned max_objstatus = PRINT_STEP_LEVELS[slapsMergeSlicesAndEval]; // where the per object operations end
const unsigned max_objstatus = 50; // where the per object operations end
// the coefficient that multiplies the per object status values which
// are set up for <0, 100>. They need to be scaled into the whole process
@ -802,13 +802,13 @@ void SLAPrint::process()
init = int(init * ostepd); // scale the init portion
// scaling for the sub operations
double d = *stthis / (objcount * 100.0);
double d = *stthis / 100.0;
ctl.statuscb = [this, init, d](unsigned st, const std::string& msg)
ctl.statuscb = [this, init, d, ostepd](unsigned st, const std::string& /*msg*/)
{
//FIXME this status line scaling does not seem to be correct.
// How does it account for an increasing object index?
report_status(*this, int(init + st*d), msg);
report_status(*this, int(init + st*d*ostepd), OBJ_STEP_LABELS[slaposSupportTree]);
};
ctl.stopcondition = [this](){ return canceled(); };
@ -1252,18 +1252,29 @@ void SLAPrint::process()
auto lvlcnt = unsigned(m_printer_input.size());
printer.layers(lvlcnt);
// slot is the portion of 100% that is realted to rasterization
unsigned slot = PRINT_STEP_LEVELS[slapsRasterize];
// ist: initial state; pst: previous state
unsigned ist = max_objstatus, pst = ist;
// coefficient to map the rasterization state (0-99) to the allocated
// portion (slot) of the process state
double sd = (100 - ist) / 100.0;
double sd = (100 - max_objstatus) / 100.0;
// slot is the portion of 100% that is realted to rasterization
unsigned slot = PRINT_STEP_LEVELS[slapsRasterize];
// ist: initial state; pst: previous state
unsigned ist = std::accumulate(PRINT_STEP_LEVELS.begin(),
PRINT_STEP_LEVELS.begin()+slapsRasterize,
0u);
ist = max_objstatus + unsigned(ist * sd);
unsigned pst = ist;
double increment = (slot * sd) / m_printer_input.size();
double dstatus = double(ist);
SpinMutex slck;
// procedure to process one height level. This will run in parallel
auto lvlfn =
[this, &slck, &printer, slot, sd, ist, &pst]
[this, &slck, &printer, increment, &dstatus, &pst]
(unsigned level_id)
{
if(canceled()) return;
@ -1280,9 +1291,10 @@ void SLAPrint::process()
printer.finish_layer(level_id);
// Status indication guarded with the spinlock
auto st = ist + unsigned(sd*level_id*slot/m_printer_input.size());
{
std::lock_guard<SpinMutex> lck(slck);
dstatus += increment;
auto st = unsigned(dstatus);
if( st > pst) {
report_status(*this, int(st),
PRINT_STEP_LABELS[slapsRasterize]);