Fix regression introduced by max width check

This commit is contained in:
Alessandro Ranellucci 2014-01-11 18:41:44 +01:00
parent 5c02bfd310
commit b43ead06fe

View file

@ -480,6 +480,7 @@ our $Options = {
cli => 'first-layer-extrusion-width=s',
type => 'f',
default => '200%',
ratio_over => 'first_layer_height',
},
'perimeter_extrusion_width' => {
label => 'Perimeters',
@ -489,6 +490,7 @@ our $Options = {
type => 'f',
aliases => [qw(perimeters_extrusion_width)],
default => 0,
ratio_over => 'layer_height',
},
'infill_extrusion_width' => {
label => 'Infill',
@ -497,6 +499,7 @@ our $Options = {
cli => 'infill-extrusion-width=s',
type => 'f',
default => 0,
ratio_over => 'layer_height',
},
'solid_infill_extrusion_width' => {
label => 'Solid infill',
@ -505,6 +508,7 @@ our $Options = {
cli => 'solid-infill-extrusion-width=s',
type => 'f',
default => 0,
ratio_over => 'layer_height',
},
'top_infill_extrusion_width' => {
label => 'Top solid infill',
@ -513,6 +517,7 @@ our $Options = {
cli => 'top-infill-extrusion-width=s',
type => 'f',
default => 0,
ratio_over => 'layer_height',
},
'support_material_extrusion_width' => {
label => 'Support material',
@ -521,6 +526,7 @@ our $Options = {
cli => 'support-material-extrusion-width=s',
type => 'f',
default => 0,
ratio_over => 'layer_height',
},
'bridge_flow_ratio' => {
label => 'Bridge flow ratio',
@ -1477,7 +1483,7 @@ sub validate {
my $max_nozzle_diameter = max(@{ $self->nozzle_diameter });
die "Invalid extrusion width (too large)\n"
if defined first { $_ > 10 * $max_nozzle_diameter }
map $self->get("${_}_extrusion_width"),
map $self->get_value("${_}_extrusion_width"),
qw(perimeter infill solid_infill top_infill support_material first_layer);
}