Merge branch 'lm_empty_layer_crash'

This commit is contained in:
Lukas Matena 2020-06-03 15:57:52 +02:00
commit d95c151823
2 changed files with 17 additions and 41 deletions

View File

@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ void ToolOrdering::fill_wipe_tower_partitions(const PrintConfig &config, coordf_
max_layer_height = std::min(max_layer_height, mlh);
}
// The Prusa3D Fast (0.35mm layer height) print profile sets a higher layer height than what is normally allowed
// by the nozzle. This is a hack and it works by increasing extrusion width.
// by the nozzle. This is a hack and it works by increasing extrusion width. See GH #3919.
max_layer_height = std::max(max_layer_height, max_object_layer_height);
for (size_t i = 0; i + 1 < m_layer_tools.size(); ++ i) {
@ -400,47 +400,21 @@ void ToolOrdering::fill_wipe_tower_partitions(const PrintConfig &config, coordf_
// and maybe other problems. We will therefore go through layer_tools and detect and fix this.
// So, if there is a non-object layer starting with different extruder than the last one ended with (or containing more than one extruder),
// we'll mark it with has_wipe tower.
assert(! m_layer_tools.empty() && m_layer_tools.front().has_wipe_tower);
if (! m_layer_tools.empty() && m_layer_tools.front().has_wipe_tower) {
for (size_t i = 0; i + 1 < m_layer_tools.size();) {
const LayerTools &lt = m_layer_tools[i];
assert(lt.has_wipe_tower);
assert(! lt.extruders.empty());
// Find the next layer with wipe tower or mark a layer as such.
size_t j = i + 1;
for (; j < m_layer_tools.size() && ! m_layer_tools[j].has_wipe_tower; ++ j) {
LayerTools &lt_next = m_layer_tools[j];
if (lt_next.extruders.empty()) {
//FIXME Vojtech: Lukasi, proc?
j = m_layer_tools.size();
break;
}
if (lt_next.extruders.front() != lt.extruders.back() || lt_next.extruders.size() > 1) {
// Support only layer, soluble layers? Otherwise the layer should have been already marked as having wipe tower.
assert(lt_next.has_support && ! lt_next.has_object);
lt_next.has_wipe_tower = true;
break;
}
for (unsigned int i=0; i+1<m_layer_tools.size(); ++i) {
LayerTools& lt = m_layer_tools[i];
LayerTools& lt_next = m_layer_tools[i+1];
if (lt.extruders.empty() || lt_next.extruders.empty())
break;
if (!lt_next.has_wipe_tower && (lt_next.extruders.front() != lt.extruders.back() || lt_next.extruders.size() > 1))
lt_next.has_wipe_tower = true;
// We should also check that the next wipe tower layer is no further than max_layer_height:
unsigned int j = i+1;
double last_wipe_tower_print_z = lt_next.print_z;
while (++j < m_layer_tools.size()-1 && !m_layer_tools[j].has_wipe_tower)
if (m_layer_tools[j+1].print_z - last_wipe_tower_print_z > max_layer_height + EPSILON) {
m_layer_tools[j].has_wipe_tower = true;
last_wipe_tower_print_z = m_layer_tools[j].print_z;
}
if (j == m_layer_tools.size())
// No wipe tower above layer i, therefore no need to add any wipe tower layer above i.
break;
// We should also check that the next wipe tower layer is no further than max_layer_height.
// This algorith may in theory create very thin wipe layer j if layer closely below j is marked as wipe tower.
// This may happen if printing with non-soluble break away supports.
// On the other side it should not hurt as there will be no wipe, just perimeter and sparse infill printed
// at that particular wipe tower layer without extruder change.
double last_wipe_tower_print_z = lt.print_z;
assert(m_layer_tools[j].has_wipe_tower);
for (size_t k = i + 1; k < j; ++k) {
assert(! m_layer_tools[k].has_wipe_tower);
if (m_layer_tools[k + 1].print_z - last_wipe_tower_print_z > max_layer_height + EPSILON) {
m_layer_tools[k].has_wipe_tower = true;
last_wipe_tower_print_z = m_layer_tools[k].print_z;
}
}
i = j;
}
}
// Calculate the wipe_tower_layer_height values.

View File

@ -13,6 +13,8 @@
#include "wxExtensions.hpp"
#include "ObjectDataViewModel.hpp"
#include "libslic3r/PrintConfig.hpp"
class wxBoxSizer;
class wxBitmapComboBox;
class wxMenuItem;