3DPrinting/PrusaSlicer-NonPlainar
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

Fix of unnecessary splitting of solid fill surfaces.

Browse source 
This is a regression issue introduced in PrusaSlicer 2.3.0 with
the configurable anchoring.
This commit is contained in:
Vojtech Bubnik 2021-02-11 10:41:53 +01:00
parent 4151922f7c
commit 039cf8f423
1 changed files with 3 additions and 2 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

5
src/libslic3r/Fill/Fill.cpp
View file

@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ std::vector<SurfaceFill> group_fills(const Layer &layer)
params.spacing = params.flow.spacing();
// Don't limit anchor length for solid or bridging infill.
params.anchor_length = 1000.f;
params.anchor_length_max = 1000.f;
} else {
// it's internal infill, so we can calculate a generic flow spacing
// for all layers, for avoiding the ugly effect of
@ -178,8 +179,8 @@ std::vector<SurfaceFill> group_fills(const Layer &layer)
params.anchor_length_max = float(region_config.infill_anchor_max);
if (region_config.infill_anchor_max.percent)
params.anchor_length_max = float(params.anchor_length_max * 0.01 * params.spacing);
}
params.anchor_length = std::min(params.anchor_length, params.anchor_length_max);
params.anchor_length = std::min(params.anchor_length, params.anchor_length_max);
}
auto it_params = set_surface_params.find(params);
if (it_params == set_surface_params.end())