In PR #3093 the progmem array FW_VERSION_NR was introduced to store the
version components, however the code didn't read it properly using the
pgm_read_* functions, making version comparisons fail.
Fix the existing/unused is_provided_version_newer() and reuse it in
show_upgrade_dialog_if_version_newer().
Similarly also read/update correctly the version in the eeprom.
- Move D23 into it's own function inside Dcodes
- Correctly include a break in the switch statement
- Show the dumper status (enabled/disabled) after toggling
- Allow to generate an immediate dump via g-code using D23 E for
symmetry with D20 E
When building with GCC 4.9.2 (bundled with PF-build-env-1.0.6.*), -Os
and LTO enabled, PID_autotune gets automatically inlined into
process_commands().
Sadly, due to the massive size of process_commands(), it results in
codegen bug doing a partial stack overwrite in process_commands()
itself, manifesting as random behavior depending on the timing of
interrupts and the codepath taken inside the merged function.
Mark the function as noinline and add a note about the affected compiler
version in order to be checked again in the future.
Instead of using a mixture of int8_t, unsigned char and (incorrectly)
int, use uint8_t consistently for indexing the current block.
This improves the performance of the wait loop in plan_buffer_line,
which currently expands all comparisons to a word for no reason.
This also extends the theoretical limit to 128 entries.
Add some static assertions to ensure BLOCK_BUFFER_SIZE is correct.
This avoids the "busy" output interleaving with regular output in very
rare scenarios.
We should focus in finding which calls are not using manage_inactivity()
properly instead of working it around.
Code running in the temperature ISR needs to be fully reentrant, which
is hard to track down.
Move autoreporting to the main processing loop. This can make the
autoreporting slower or pause at times, but removes the reentrant
restriction, which allows us to use printf_P.
This PROGMEM is currently ignored by gcc, but even if it wasn't it
wouldn't be correct since the following code is expecting to read "item"
without fetching the array itself from PROGMEM.
